Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Karma Rewards Ferrari Champion

http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/karma-rewards-ferrari-champion/"KimiKimi Raikkonen celebrating after winning the Brazilian Grand Prix. (Photo by Kerim Okten/European Pressphoto Association) More photos.

When Kimi Raikkonen, racing for Ferrari, won the 2007 Formula One world championship on Sunday, it definitely had the feeling of karma finally coming back around for him — although it took a while to develop. After qualifying on Saturday, Raikkonen sat third, behind Felipe Massa and Lewis Hamilton, who qualified first and second. Fernando Alonso was fourth. At that point, it would’ve been tough to believe in a Raikkonen title.

Then Hamilton made a big mistake. Fighting Alonso for position through the fourth corner, he braked late and ran wide, falling behind and tracking over the cross-grained curb. The two Ferraris pulled away with the lead.

I wasn’t rooting against Hamilton. And I would have been thrilled with a Hamilton win. But deep down I was pulling for Raikkonen (even though I said it was unlikely that he’d take the title). Here’s why:

Formula One is filled with conflicts of social guilt, which could be best illustrated by the fact that the championship came down to two teams that spend a combined $700 million each year – much of that going toward parts used in a single grand prix before being scrapped. By and large, Formula One drivers are coddled like precious show ponies. They spend more time thinking about the scruff of their facial growth and mutton chops than their fans, who shell out hundreds to watch them from afar. They lack emotion, speak only in clichés, and only a few sign autographs (and don’t enjoy it). The ugliness spilled out this season reached a new peak, with the Ferrari-McLaren spy story and courtroom proceedings, backstabbing e-mails and ego wars.

Rooting for one multimillionaire cover-boy zombie over another makes me very self-aware of the indefensible nature of my support. Raikkonen has never been an easy guy to root for. He doesn’t seem care for the history of Formula One. He’s reclusive. And he speaks like a Cylon from Battlestar Galactica. But he’s also one of the most naturally gifted drivers in the history of the sport. And one of the unluckiest. And deep down in the layers of chance and probability that factor into each sporting event and season, there lurked the slimmest of opportunities for karma to return some of what it took from Raikkonen over the past five years. How could you root against that?

*

Though Raikkonen was just two points from the title in 2003, everyone talks about 2004, his third season with McLaren, as the one that best symbolizes the rotten luck that would plague his racing career. Known for producing tremendously reliable racecars, McLaren lost its touch that year, and Raikkonen’s engines kept going kablooey. In the first seven races, he only completed two. At Hockenheim he lost his rear wing while lapping at 180 m.p.h. The wing just detached from the car, a completely freak occurrence, a one-in-a-million malfunction from a team that never leaves its Tag Heuers unsynchronized. But still, it was Michael Schumacher’s year, as he won 15 out of 18 races and clinched the championship with four races remaining.

The following year, on the other hand, was definitely in Raikkonen’s reach.

http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/karma-rewards-ferrari-champion/"Photographshttp://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/karma-rewards-ferrari-champion/" Slide Show: Highlights of Kimi Raikkonen’s Career

In 2005, Raikkonen had overcome some early misfortunes (bad tire valve, and bad tires in general) to contend for the championship. But while leading the European Grand Prix, he flat-spotted a tire while lapping Jacques Villeneuve. The tire’s irregular shape caused his suspension to vibrate excessively. These were the days of the single-tire rule, and Raikkonen wasn’t allowed to stop for a tire change without suffering a penalty that would put him out of the points. The team decided to take a chance and left him out on the track. It almost worked. But on the final lap, the suspension failed, and he smashed into a tire wall. He lost the championship that year to Alonso by 21 points.

It looked like Raikkonen was on track for a similar outcome this season. His only DNFs were from mechanical problems. Heading into Brazil, he had more career wins than several world champions. Next year, he would have passed Stirling Moss as the driver with the most wins without a title. In other words, he was due for some good luck, but even with a strong start and a fast car, so many other things had to go right:

- First of all, he needed to win — not necessarily a given in Brazil, where he had yet to win a grand prix.

- He needed Hamilton to finish sixth or worse. Hamilton ended the suspense early when he took the long way around turn four, after battling Alonso through the Senna S’s and the back straight. But by the second lap, Hamilton had already reclaimed several lost positions. He was definitely on the charge when his gearbox went on the blink, suddenly shifting to neutral and staying there for several seconds. There are reports that Hamilton says he accidentally thumbed the button for the start sequence (of course, McLaren has denied this), but whatever happened, Hamilton was 18th by the time his car recovered.

- In order for Hamilton to finish with less than four points, Raikkonen needed the BMW Saubers and Nico Rosberg’s Williams-Toyota to stay between Hamilton and the three leaders. This meant that two young second-year drivers (Rosberg and Robert Kubica) needed to drive cleanly while fighting for position throughout the final stint of the race. It also meant that Rosberg’s car had to stay together through an entire race, which didn’t happen much this season.

- Massa had to finish second behind Raikkonen. In the post-race interview, Raikkonen said that the Ferraris were much faster than the rest of the field (and had more speed than they revealed in the race), so it probably wasn’t that difficult for Massa to stay far ahead of Alonso. Even so, he nearly went off a few laps before the final pitstop but managed to recover after losing only several seconds.

(By the way, how upset did Felipe Massa look on the podium and in the post-race interview? If fact, he looked more upset than Raikkonen looked happy. Massa seemed to go out of his way to not congratulate Raikkonen, saying he was happy for the team instead. His lack of tact was made more striking when Fernando Alonso began his first statement by offering his congratulations. I can understand being disappointed, but not enough not to congratulate his teammate.)

- McLaren needs to lose its appeal against the stewards, which should be heard by the F.I.A. in a couple of weeks. At the end of the grand prix in Brazil, the stewards confiscated the two Sauber BMWs and Nico Rosberg’s Williams to check for a fuel temperature violation. The results were inconclusive and no penalties were handed down. But McLaren has filed an appeal against the ruling. Should they win, it still isn’t immediately evident that the F.I.A. would disqualify the three cars in question, which would take the championship away from Raikkonen and award it to Hamilton. Several drivers have spoken out against this result, including Hamilton, Alonso, and former driver Stirling Moss. But still, it’s Raikkonen we’re talking about, so anything can happen…

http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/karma-rewards-ferrari-champion/"Photographshttp://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/karma-rewards-ferrari-champion/" Slide Show: Highlights of Kimi Raikkonen’s Career

17 comments so far...

  • 1.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    7:42 pm

    Brilliant description of Formula 1. A great sport, F1, but the description of what the sport is about is spot on, save for a failure to mention the unbelievable technology involved in the sport.

    — Posted by M.P. D'Ambrisi

  • 2.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    8:02 pm

    What single tire rule was there in 2005?

    — Posted by Paul J

  • 3.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    8:25 pm

    Hi Paul J,

    In 2005, the F.I.A. imposed a new tire rule that limited teams to one set of tires for qualifying and the race with the hopes of cutting down costs. You can read more about it in this article from The International Herald Tribune. Here’s an excerpt:

    In the name of improving spectacle, for example, the International Automobile Federation, the sport’s governing body, has banished the most spectacular moment of a Formula One race: the tire change.

    Those dramatic, lively pit stops, when 22 team members, many dressed in fireproof suits andhelmets, descend on a ca to refuel it and change its tires in less than five seconds are gone. Each car must use the same tires through qualifying and the race. If a tire blows, it may be changed, but only that tire, and not during refueling.

    For me, it was one of the worst rules in recent memory and led up to the debacle at the United States Grand Prix that year (note: you can’t refer to that race without using the word “debacle”).

    — Posted by Richard S. Chang

  • 4.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    8:27 pm

    Always nice to read about F1 in main stream media, and even nicer when it is so well-informed. Watching the race in a Brasilian bar with a number of other fans, who were all hoping that Hamilton would win, I was surprised to see how happy we all were that Räikkönen finally got his championship. Well-deserved indeed!

    Also, it is funny to talk about karma and $700 million in the same breath…

    — Posted by Håkan

  • 5.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    8:43 pm

    It must be said that in spite of Kimi’s run of atrocious luck at McLaren, he never complained. He never blamed the team for the DNFs, and he always expressed hope that the next race could end on a more positive note. Say what you will about Kimi–he’s detached, not a great public speaker, etc.–but he’s never been a diva. Besides, eloquence and personality never won anyone a world championship. The man can drive.

    — Posted by Deb J

  • 6.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    8:49 pm

    Thank you for this concise and cogent summary of why and how so many gods had to smile in order for Kimi to win his long-overdue championship. I’m going to e-mail it to my bemused American friends who know of my long-standing F1 fanaticism but who glaze over when I try to do a little ’splaining. (It’s especially painful when they try to make nice by assuming I watch NASCAR, too. Now that’s a name they recognize.)

    I have only to convince them that the name Kimi isn’t just for cheerleaders anymore.

    Forza Ferrari!

    — Posted by Vanessa G

  • 7.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    9:24 pm

    Congrats Kimi. And to think he needed a conditional license to begin his carrer with Sauber because he so few races under his belt. Louis has his entire career ahead. Kimi deserved this one.

    — Posted by Phil W

  • 8.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    9:30 pm

    Very good, concise article, Richard, especially for the massese who miss out on this fantastic sport.

    However, your description of Massa’s disapointment left out the fact that he, Massa, having won pole and handily controlling the race and in position for his OWN victory in front of his Brazillion countrymen, was called in early for his second pit stop, in order to allow Kimi to open up a gap that would hand him the win, and at the finish, the championship. This was understandable, as the championship meant more to the team than a victory for Massa, who carries the dreaded Ferrari #2 label, that of the support driver.

    How would you feel if you had a for-sure victory taken away “for the sake of the team” and for the sake of your teamate—who is also your rival? As one of the TV commentators stated, Massa, “took a bullet” for the team. And Massa did, however reluctantly, and belatedly, congratulate Kimi in the post-race press conference.

    And as far as Kimi being one of the most talented drivers in F1 history; I will give you this. He is one of the best when he is out in front turning fast lap after fast lap. If I had to depend on a driver to make up ground from back in the field I would take Alonso, Hamilton, or Vettel any day over Kimi

    — Posted by Flat Out Forever

  • 9.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    9:31 pm

    Kimi, Fernando, Lewis and Felipe all made for an amazing F1 season. I do miss Michael but this was an awesome year for F1 despite all of the off track issues. I just hope Kimi does not loose his championship due to an appeal by McLaren.

    It is so good to see F1 coverage by the best paper in the free world. I just wish more people in the states were interested in F1.

    We have been to every F1 race at Indy and think it is a real shame that the worlds most popular racing will not be retuning to the U.S. next year. Maybe in 09.

    Thanks again NY Times.

    — Posted by deankat

  • 10.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    9:38 pm

    They called it Formula ‘noia’ in Italy a few years ago… meaning Formula ‘boredom’, because of the scarcity of spectacular overtaking.
    Well wasn’t this year’s GP finale breathtaking?
    Three drivers fighting for the championship until the end, and this Kimi Raikkonen coming back from nowhere, just like his red Ferrari. Not able to smile, not even after he claims the title.
    Who could have thought Ferrari would have found a driver with even less PR skills than his decorated predecessor Michael Schumacher.
    Just one stone in the shoe remains… the spy story and Ron Dennis (Mc Laren’s chief), aka the evil man of motor sports. He appealed to get the Williams disqualified so his English protégé’ can claim a title even Hamilton doesn’t feel he deserves anymore. Perhaps FIA should show him that the gravity of his team’s actions could and should have meant far superior punishment.

    — Posted by Gianclaudio Angelini

  • 11.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    10:08 pm

    I was greatly surprised to hear of Kimi’s win but the rookie choked. It was great to see him win. Yes, a great summary of the sport but when will the cars start racing again. Usually, each race is decided by the qualifying hour. One fast lap at the end and if you are on the pole, you will probably win the next day. Get rid of the driver’s aids including automatic transmissions and traction control, mandatory pit stops and the airplane devices all over the cars. Maybe when the cars start looking like race cars, we will see the racing return which means passing on the track; not in the pits.

    — Posted by mh lager

  • 12.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    10:24 pm

    Thank you for the outstanding article. To me there are so many lessons to take away from this year’s championship. The chief lesson is the embodiment of Ferrari. The lesson is of Hope. This season and this race stand firmly for the proposition to never give up Hope to stay in the fight (how Churchill-English of me!) no matter what the odds, no matter what the circumstances or the politics. Ferrari worked harder and better throughout the season and never gave up Hope that they would overcome their faults. They defeated all competitors only after realizing their own personal limitations and overcoming them through teamwork and love. Yes love. Passionate Love of the family team, of the history, of the tradition, of the sport, and of excellence. It is a beautiful story and I am happy to have shared in it. Thank you again for your article.

    — Posted by ScuderiaGrasso

  • 13.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    10:34 pm

    Massa always looks upset in second place. To say it was tremendously difficult for him to slow for Kimi on home soil would be the understatement of the year. I feel bad for the Brazilian. But let’s face it, if he had won the race and Kimi lost the championship, he would not have a ride at Ferrari next year.

    — Posted by Ezn

  • 14.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    10:59 pm

    I was rooting for Hamilton, but it was a great end to a great season, even with all the politics. Keep up the good work, Mr. Chang and if the best paper in the world keeps publicizing the sport, maybe more Americans will tune in.

    — Posted by Jim P.

  • 15.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    11:03 pm

    @Flat Out Forever

    Suzuka 2005. Kimi, 17th to 1st, overtaking move of the decade on Fisi at the very last corner.

    — Posted by Guugoo

  • 16.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    11:04 pm

    As an American living in Finland, I am in the middle of Finland’s obsession with racing. But before you characterize his speech as robotic, may I ask how well you would address a crowd of reporters using Finnish? He speaks English stiffly, he drives sublimely. Try living in a world using your second ( or third ) language. Hyvä Kimi!

    — Posted by Stu

  • 17.
    October 23rd,
    2007
    11:16 pm

    @ Flat out Forever

    There were many times that Kimi had to come back from the very end. McLaren seemed to always need engine swappings and that cost him qualifying spots.

    In the 2005 British Grand Prix, his grid start was 12th and he ended in 3rd place. Not to mention Suzuka 2005 when he went from 17th to 1st. Kimi is astounding in bouncing back. He’s definitely not dependent on pole position.

    — Posted by Elba

Add your comments...

    Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Member Center > Site Help > Frequently Asked Questions About Commentshttp://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/karma-rewards-ferrari-champion/">Comments FAQ.

    About Wheels

    A team of New York Times contributors blogs about news, trends and all things automotive. Check back for insight, photos, reviews of cars and more. And remember to join the conversation — you can comment on the cars, offer your own reviews, and post questions in our reader comment area.

    Monthly Archives

    Recent Posts

    • October 23
      17 comments

      Karma Rewards Ferrari Champion

      When Kimi Raikkonen, racing for Ferrari, won the 2007 Formula One world championship on Sunday, it definitely had the feeling of karma finally coming back around for him — although you wouldn’t have recognized it after qualifying on Saturday.

    • October 23
      6 comments

      Early Rumblings From Tokyo: Next NSX Will Appear in 2009

      In an interview with Autocar magazine, Honda’s chief executive, Takeo Fukui, revealed that the next Honda supercar (or follow-up to the NSX) will be introduced at the 2009 Tokyo Motor Show and pack a V10 gasoline engine.

    • October 22
      0 comments

      Monday Morning Motorsports

      The weekend’s results in motor racing: Raikkonen wins the Formula One championship; Johnson tops Gordon at Martinsville; Stoner wins again; Bourdais takes Champ Car title.

    • October 20
      13 comments

      Reasons to Watch the Formula One Finale

      Everyone should be excited for the Brazilian Grand Prix this weekend, which could be the most eagerly awaited season finale in nearly a decade. For the first time since 1986, the championship will be decided at the final grand prix.

    • October 18
      150 comments

      Tomorrow’s Chevrolet: Two Vaporwares in Every Garage?

      Vaporware is a term the computer industry uses to describe a new product that is hyped but never delivered. That term came to mind when I saw the new Chevrolet advertising campaign, “Gas-Friendly to Gas-Free.”

    Feeds